• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    So would sand and talc powder. Diamond dust.

    It’s cheap and doesn’t hurt you. There are more food like things that will fix it that are more expensive.

    • @Aux
      link
      61 year ago

      Cellulose from wood is literally a dietary fibre. Just like that good healthy fibre you are getting from kale. Which is also mostly cellulose. There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

      • @Bgugi
        link
        91 year ago

        I don’t think it’s fair to say kale and cellulose are basically the same.

        I’d much rather eat cellulose.

      • htrayl
        link
        21 year ago

        Yup, actually cellulose in food is not a problem at all in my mind, and is probably actually improving the average Americans health if anything.

      • kase
        link
        11 year ago

        There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

        Be careful now, say something like that and someone might start a weird fad diet

        • @Aux
          link
          21 year ago

          High fibre diets already exist.

          • kase
            link
            11 year ago

            True, but I was thinking sawdust diet lol

      • @T00l_shed
        link
        01 year ago

        Well there is right? Kale has other macro and micro nutrients, unlike you’re referring to the Fibre part only, then there would be no different right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        What? Does sawdust have high levels of vitamins A, B6, C, K, folate, fiber, carotenoids and manganese? The last time i checked it doesn’t.

        • @Aux
          link
          21 year ago

          We’re talking about fibre here. If anything, pure cellulose is better than kale.