• @Aux
    link
    61 year ago

    Cellulose from wood is literally a dietary fibre. Just like that good healthy fibre you are getting from kale. Which is also mostly cellulose. There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

    • @Bgugi
      link
      91 year ago

      I don’t think it’s fair to say kale and cellulose are basically the same.

      I’d much rather eat cellulose.

    • htrayl
      link
      21 year ago

      Yup, actually cellulose in food is not a problem at all in my mind, and is probably actually improving the average Americans health if anything.

    • kase
      link
      11 year ago

      There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

      Be careful now, say something like that and someone might start a weird fad diet

      • @Aux
        link
        21 year ago

        High fibre diets already exist.

        • kase
          link
          11 year ago

          True, but I was thinking sawdust diet lol

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      01 year ago

      Well there is right? Kale has other macro and micro nutrients, unlike you’re referring to the Fibre part only, then there would be no different right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      What? Does sawdust have high levels of vitamins A, B6, C, K, folate, fiber, carotenoids and manganese? The last time i checked it doesn’t.

      • @Aux
        link
        21 year ago

        We’re talking about fibre here. If anything, pure cellulose is better than kale.