If "direct armed conflict" erupts "between Russia and NATO," Russia's envoy tells Newsweek, "the United States will not be able to hide behind the ocean."
    • @zurma
      1•2 years ago

      Can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic but I’ll be charitable and assume you are.

        • @certain_people
          1•2 years ago

          I don’t understand if you are brain damaged. Destroying a nuclear power plant - releasing a cloud of radioactive debris - is in no way comparable to using depleted uranium shells.

          Seriously, your argument is like saying “Well it’s OK for us to use chemical weapons because they used bleach for cleaning”. It’s beyond ridiculous.

        • Lols [they/them]
          0•2 years ago

          anything on ‘the use of any tactical nuclear weapon’ or ‘the destruction of a nuclear facility’, what with that being what the conversation is about and all

            • Lols [they/them]
              0•2 years ago

              yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an “immediate response”, and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions

              thats why it says “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”

              as opposed to “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”

              so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says