X adds video calling — and lets strangers ring you: Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up::Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Headline: “let’s anyone you follow potentially call you up”

    Article: “To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.”

    This makes total sense. Your DM conversation has too much back and forth so you say “let’s take it to an audio or video call”, and then hash it out in person.

    There’s a reason Slack has this exact same feature…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I think the problem here is there’s no prior consent. If you’ve DM’d someone in the past, they can now call you. Twitter never had video call before, and the people who use it never expected to be giving consent for a video call maybe even several years later.

      • @crashoverride
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Why did we go from the more descriptive "private message (PM) to direct (DM)like why replace it? Anyone know?

        • MrScottyTay
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Because of the implication it’s not actually private, since admins can see it and/or it’s used for analytics.

          • @crashoverride
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            It’s still private for the purposes that other users can’t see it.

            • Zoot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Yeah, however the term is disingenuous.

            • @RazorsLedge
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              But still not actually private