• AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Kao and his team will be monitoring earthquake activity from underground carbon storage facilities over five years, studying the possible effects of the injections and analyzing what can be done to mitigate or eliminate those risks.

    “This is an important issue because if the induced earthquakes happen to be a significant one that actually becomes large enough for the local communities to feel it or even have some damage … then the regulatory agencies will have to shut the injection operation down.”

    Earthquakes caused by injecting a liquid underground — also known as induced seismicity — have been well documented in the U.S. and Canada when it comes to fracking and wastewater disposal, including by Kao in B.C.

    If a major earthquake ruptures through cap rock atop of a carbon storage area, it could create a pathway for injected CO2 to escape, he said.

    Erik Nickel is the chief operating officer of the Petroleum Technology Research Centre, which oversees the Aquistore carbon storage facility in Estevan, Sask.

    “It would make a lot of sense to include us in there because of our history of not really having much seismic activity,” Nickel said, adding the site sits on flatlands and is not near the boundary of tectonic plates.


    The original article contains 780 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!