It’s a slightly click-baity title, but as we’re still generating more content for our magazines, this one included, why not?

My Sci-fi unpopular opinion is that 2001: A Space Odyssey is nothing but pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. I’ve tried watching it multiple times and each time I have absolutely no patience for the pointless little scenes which contain little to no depth or meaningful plot, all coalescing towards that 15 minute “journey” through space and series of hallucinations or whatever that are supposed to be deep, shake you to your foundations, and make you re-think the whole human condition.

But it doesn’t. Because it’s just pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. Planet of the Apes was released in the same year and is, on every level, a better Sci-fi movie. It offers mystery, a consistent and engaging plot, relatable characters you actually care about, and asks a lot more questions about the world and our place in it.

It insists upon itself, Lois.

  • Destroyer Of Worlds
    link
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Fast and Furious movies are science fiction movies. The complete disregard for how physics work is literally impossible visual fiction foisted into our faces against the concept of reality.

    and because, Family.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I’m actually of the opinion that the main characters know they are in a movie - or at the least are aware they are able to do completely unrealistic feats.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Science fiction is per definition based on science and the F&F movies ignore it completely. They could be classified as fantasy or whatever, but from sci-fi they are as far away as they could be.

      • gimpchrist
        link
        18 months ago

        Technically their cars have boosters and stuff that’s kind of sciencey and they use computers… there’s one whole guy who does nothing but uses computers and stuff