@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoWhere do you see yourself in 10 years?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up12.14Karrow-down147
arrow-up12.09Karrow-down1imageWhere do you see yourself in 10 years?lemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square121fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•1 year agoI am intrigued to know what is the original message.
minus-squareZorquelinkfedilink23•1 year ago“Millions of people doing lower waste” Basically saying that reducing the problem in smaller steps on a larger scale does more than a few fanatics doing everything all by themselves. Its also to help alleviate the guilt of not being able to reduce waste to nothing.
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilink3•1 year agoThe problem is getting millions on board. In the 1970s, the zip code was a hard sell, and it had PSAs
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilink3•edit-21 year agoThat one is a bit more about the how rather than the why. HTBUaP gets into the nitty about ruling out less violent action since out industrialist-owned officials haven’t responded sufficiently concerns and grievances.
I am intrigued to know what is the original message.
“Millions of people doing lower waste”
Basically saying that reducing the problem in smaller steps on a larger scale does more than a few fanatics doing everything all by themselves.
Its also to help alleviate the guilt of not being able to reduce waste to nothing.
The problem is getting millions on board. In the 1970s, the zip code was a hard sell, and it had PSAs
There’s this original message.
I’m partial to the TM 31-210 handbook myself
That one is a bit more about the how rather than the why. HTBUaP gets into the nitty about ruling out less violent action since out industrialist-owned officials haven’t responded sufficiently concerns and grievances.