• @shalafi
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Net negative likely. How much CO2 was emitted to create this plant?

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Per the article, building the plant generated about 15% of the CO2 it will remove. Operating it and downtime consume another 20% or so. It’s still a net benefit…but a tiny one.

    • @grabyourmotherskeys
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have a way to do this but it would require people to plant trees.

      https://ecotree.green/en/how-much-co2-does-a-tree-absorb

      25kg per year, per tree. Let’s plant these “trees” everywhere.

      If every one of the 20 some million adult Canadians planted a tree once a week for say 10 weeks a year, just imagine. 20 million x 10 x 25kg sequestered a year later and you get additional benefits. No need to change your lifestyle, just plant on on the fringe of grass by the Walmart parking spot, drop on in by your workplace, etc. Golf courses: sorry we need trees, your lifestyle will change sooner rather than later anyway golf course user.

      Edit: 5 million metric tonnes, I think.

      And, hey, why not pay young people to do this? You get a tray of trees in the morning. Sign into your app, document each tree. In addition to planting the app sends you to previous locations others planted trees at to verify the tree is there.

      • @Squeak
        link
        71 year ago

        5 million tonnes.

        But then if 4000 tonnes is equal to reversing 3s worth of emissions, 5 million tonnes would still only be 3750s, or just over 1 hour.

        • @grabyourmotherskeys
          link
          21 year ago

          Yup, not awesome but you do it year after year. It might help raise consciousness. But, yes, ultimately a drop in the bucket.