• @jordanlundM
    link
    71 year ago

    Start with “Which came first, people or animals?”

    Genesis 1:

    20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

    24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

    26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

    27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    Genesis 2:

    7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

    19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

    21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

    22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

    • @agent_flounder
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Indeed. Two stories from two regions mashed up into the Septuagint along with a number of other writings, much of it proven to be anachronistic, meant to unify a kingdom politically against its rivals under one religion and one god where before there were many of each. It’s also why you see god being named in different ways in different books.

      • @jordanlundM
        link
        31 year ago

        Yup. Genesis 1 is the Elohist creation myth, Genesis 2 is the Jawhist creation myth. But try telling that to biblical literalists.

        • @agent_flounder
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Thanks; I couldn’t recall the details of which was which.

          Biblical literalists are in for some disappointment or further self delusion if told this, I am guessing.

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        21 year ago

        meant to unify a kingdom politically against its rivals

        Someone has been reading their Finkelstein, haha. I am not saying he isn’t right I remain on the fence about it as of this time.