DoorDash now warns you that your food might get cold if you don’t tip::The app-based delivery service is alerting customers that drivers may not take their order in a timely manner if there is no tip included upfront.

  • @alienanimals
    link
    English
    3111 months ago

    Tips subsidize business owners who don’t pay their employees enough.

    • @uis
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      *in US

    • @jwagner7813
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      THIS IS IT. All other comments in this thread that don’t say this are focusing on the wrong problem or are flat out wrong.

    • phillaholic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1411 months ago

      Not really. Money for everything at a business comes from customers. If anything you are subsidizing customers who don’t tip.

      • @uis
        link
        English
        711 months ago

        No, you are subsidizing owner’s new yacht.

        • phillaholic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -711 months ago

          That’s what you’re doing by spending money there at all. Do you think these owners would replace tips with money out of their own pockets?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            US minimum wage laws say yes. See: minimum wage for tipped vs non-tipped employees.

            “The minimum wage for employees who receive tips is $2.13 per hour. The amount of tips plus the $2.13 must reach at least $7.25 per hour. If not, your employer must pay to make up the difference.”

            • phillaholic
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -611 months ago

              Employees who fall into that category are either bad at their jobs or the restaurant is about to go under due to poor sales. At 20% tip they would only be selling $25 worth of food an hour per waiter.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                You seem to be moving the goalposts or talking about something different - we’re talking about employer obligations when changing between tipped and non-tipped. I quoted the department of labor to show that contrary to your incredulity, yes all employers are required to increase base pay to a higher rate in the absence of tips. You seemed to suggest that employers would not cover any increase in pay if tips were removed - however federal law requires that employers meet a higher base pay for untipped workers. This is regardless of how well a restaurant is doing - if a Michelin 5 star restaurant pays it’s employees 2.13 + tip but decides to go tip free, yes they too will be required to increase base pay to 7.25.

                The detail about restaurants also being required to cover the difference between tipped pay and 7.25 in cases where the restaurant underperforms is an unrelated detail not central to this discussion. My quote of the department of labor was only to demonstrate the 2 minimum wages between tipped and untipped pay.

                • phillaholic
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -311 months ago

                  No, I’m talking about their take home not the legal minimum. Waiters aren’t making minimum wage after tips. If tips went away tomorrow, no waiter is going to staying making $7.25 an hour. Employers having to cover wages for those that don’t receive enough tips is an inconsequential part of it.