• dinckel
    link
    English
    221 year ago

    This is kind of cool, but at the same time, there’s gotta be a catch. Beside that, I can’t imagine a situation where a residential location might want that. Even if I had a self-hosted data center for my entire family, their friends, and friends of their friends, I still couldn’t saturate that bandwidth

    • wagoner
      link
      fedilink
      English
      571 year ago

      Isn’t the catch that it’s 900 dollars a month?

      • SaltySalamander
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        About 10 years ago, the muni fiber outfit in the town next door lit up 10Gbit fiber for their entire footprint. The price? $900/mo. It’s currently $300/mo, and they just turned on 25Gbit across their entire footprint ($1500/mo).

      • @PeterPoopshit
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s probably still a bandwidth cap and it’s probably still the same shitty 1tb everyone else gets with overage charges per gigabyte or some shit.

        “It costs four hundred thousand dollars to fire this weapon download a file for 12 seconds”

        • @douglasg14b
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          They are pretty transparent on their terms on their website. No caps on any of their other plans.

          You are using shared bandwidth like all other residential plans, meaning that if there is no available bandwidth on the network you get what you get. That’s the catch.

          Turns out when you install bundles of 80Tb/s fiber long haul interconnects. Upselling to enthusiasts can be profitable.

      • dinckel
        link
        English
        171 year ago

        Hotels are commercial property

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Orphanages then. Or student dorms