Special mention to the picard maneuver and stamets. ❤️

  • @grue
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Unfortunately this hasn’t been done for others like Deep Space Nine and Voyager, which came after TNG’s run.

    The reason for that, by the way, is that while TNG was shot on film (from which more detail could be extracted using new technology), DS9 and Voyager were at least partially mastered directly on videotape (especially the CGI effects) and thus there was no higher-quality source to pull from to begin with.

    • @Fades
      link
      11 year ago

      Oh wow! Nice to learn the actual reason why. Directly in vhs my god lol

      • @grue
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, there’s a real doughnut-hole in the '90s-2000s between when stuff was old enough to be remastered and stuff was new enough to be digital/HD to begin with. Also, I double-checked, and according to this article what I wrote before wasn’t entirely accurate: apparently the raw footage is on film, but the cut and edited product only exists on video. In theory, they could go back to the raw film and re-do the entire editing process, but it would be cost-prohibitive compared to how much consumer interest in an HD remaster they expect there to be.

        There’s a really good Technology Connections video on the topic, by the way.

        Finally, I’m not sure if “VHS” is strictly accurate. There are other varieties of videotape that might have been used.

        • @Fades
          link
          21 year ago

          Yeah no way they would eat that kind of cost for not much value overall. The fans would love it but no way they make their money back.

          Thanks for the neat info tho!