• @tacosplease
    link
    511 months ago

    I mean. Antivax bullshit is more than enough to disqualify him immediately for any sane voter. Why would someone spend any additional time learning about his other opinions?

    • PatFusty
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Thats… pretty sad. So lets say there was a candidate that had all your ideal solutions except they were what you consider antivax, that person is no longer a good candidate?

      • @tacosplease
        link
        311 months ago

        I reject the premise.

        It’s impossible for them to have all my ideal solutions because that would necessarily include supporting medical science.

        Being an outspoken antivaxxer shows a severe lack of critical thinking skills. Vaccines are not what matters most to me - having a representative that accepts reality is.

        • PatFusty
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          All i said was to suspend some disbelief. Lets pretend this candidate was a doctor themselves but had a rational take on why they are antivax.

          • @tacosplease
            link
            311 months ago

            Suspend disbelief in what? Whether vaccines work? Pretend they really do cause autism?

            Ok yeah in bizarro universe I may be interested in an antivaxxer’s opinions. And Superman is a bad guy. Puppies aren’t cute…

            How is that useful? We live in a reality where vaccines do work. They don’t cause autism. And puppies are cute AF.