One person’s content moderation is another’s censorship when it comes to Democrats’ and Republicans’ views on handling misinformation.

It’s not just about facts: Democrats and Republicans have sharply different attitudes about removing misinformation from social media::One person’s content moderation is another’s censorship when it comes to Democrats’ and Republicans’ views on handling misinformation.

  • gregorumEnglish
    4•1 year ago

    You should read the link you posted:

    This holding was possible because California’s constitution contains an affirmative right of free speech which has been liberally construed by the Supreme Court of California, while the federal constitution’s First Amendment contains only a negative command to Congress to not abridge the freedom of speech.

    So my analogy wouldn’t apply to Californian shopping malls, but it would to others, and it would apply federally.

    • ThrowawayEnglish
      -3•1 year ago

      Well damn, I got hasty.

      I still think it really should apply federally, but it doesn’t.