• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    I wonder what’s the volumetric energy density, historically that has been a bigger issue than gravimetric energy density.

    • KinNectar
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      @JohnDClay

      Good question, this article is pretty fluffy, not a lot of hard data. Reads kind of like a fluffed up press release honestly.

    • Pelicanen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      According to their site:

      A storage system of 3 m3 can store up to 10,000 kWh of energy

      So about 3.33 MWh per cubic meter, 3.33 kWh per liter, or 3.33 Wh per cubic centimeter.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hmm, if that’s correct, that’s even higher than liquid hydrogen, which would be really impressive.

        Energy densities

        Edit: Looks like their gravimetric energy density is 3.5kWh/kg

        Edit 2: here’s a comparison for batteries

        Battery Cell Energy Density

        • Pelicanen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Since it’s solid hydrogen I think it’s to be expected, however I didn’t see any information regarding energy losses which I imagine would be quite high when you have those kinds of cooling requirements.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            This is why I hate marketing pushes. If they’re a good-faith business, the efficiency needs to be within shooting distance of reasonable against costs. But as we learned from the artificial meat industry (that ultimately admitted we’ve already probably reached lifetime price/quality/scale limits from the methodologies they’re using) brutal honesty doesn’t get you investors.

    • @abhibeckert
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The article is light on details, but it claims they’re storing the hydrogen as a solid - not as a gas. Solids are generally about a thousand times more compact than a gas.

      That’s hardly a revolutionary thing - there are hydrogen powered cars on the road and those don’t use hydrogen as a gas either. Those cars don’t make much sense compared to lithium, but mostly only because there’s almost nowhere in the world you buy hydrogen for your car. That’s not an issue if you’re producing your own hydrogen at home.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They don’t? When the Toyota hydrogen cars were introduced here around 2015, one of the issues were that a full tank of gas would dilute through the tank walls within a week. From the marketing material of the latest Toyota Mirai, it seems that they still use Hydrogen stored in gas form, boasting improvements in a 3-layer tank that is tested for 235% of the pressure that the gas is stored at, compared to 150% for regular gas containers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Yeah and what does that have to do with the Hydrogen being stored in gas form? The fuel cell converts it, it isn’t a storage mechanism. Hydrogen has a boiling point of -253C, are you saying that Hydrogen powered cars are fitted with a power hungry cryo chamber to cool down the fuel to a liquid form?

            • ferret
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              They are not storing the hydrogen at atmospheric pressure

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hydrogen really really doesn’t want to be solid, so doing that requires extremely low temperatures. Seems pretty cool, but inconvenient.