• Strit
    link
    fedilink
    1381 year ago

    What if your app actually needs access to the internet?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1591 year ago

      Or actually do anything useful? No network, no filesystem… it’s a hello world app isn’t it…

      • cheer
        link
        1211 year ago

        No filesystem access for a flatpak app just means it cant read host system files on its own, without user permission. You can still give it files or directories of files through the file explorer for the app to work with, just that it’s much safer since it can only otherwise view files in its sandbox.

          • @FooBarrington
            link
            171 year ago

            Why does an IDE need unfettered access to my whole FS? Access to the project directory, and maybe the runtime directory, have to be enough.

          • @Disregard3145
            link
            81 year ago

            To be fair, the title says more apps, not all apps…

        • @kadu
          link
          -171 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            271 year ago

            As if sandboxes are some brand new concept…

            Of course people want them for some use-cases. No one here is saying that every application in the world should be restricted that way, grandpa.

            • @kautau
              link
              71 year ago

              Yeah things like selinux and apparmor have been around for a long time, sandboxing is just an evolution of that

            • @grue
              link
              English
              51 year ago

              No one here is saying that every application in the world should be restricted that way, grandpa.

              Maybe not here in this thread, but aren’t there some folks who want flatpak/snap/appimage to basically replace traditional package managers?

              • Chewy
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                […] aren’t there some folks who want flatpak/snap/appimage to basically replace traditional package managers?

                There might be people who think that, but that isn’t realistic. Flatpak is a package manager for user facing apps, mostly gui apps.

                The core system apps will still be installed by a system package manager. I.e rpm-ostree on immutable Fedora or transactional-update/zypper on OpenSUSE MicroOS.

                Snap can do system apps and user facing apps and fully snap-based Ubuntu might come in the future.

                But this won’t force people to use them. Traditional package managers will keep existing for system apps and maintainers will proabably keep their gui packages in the repos.

            • @kadu
              link
              -31 year ago

              deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        There’s Obfuscate, an image redactor, and Metadata Cleaner which is self-descriptive. Both works properly without any filesystem access at all, because they use the file picker portal to ask the user for the files to be processed.

      • @Theoriginalthon
        link
        501 year ago

        Exactly all programs should be web based cloud subscription only. We don’t want that filthy code on our rgb nvme drives

        • @Kbobabob
          link
          121 year ago

          Lol, sorry no network access either.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            BRB, modulating my RGB to send data…