China has accused Canada of carrying out “malicious and provocative” actions in the South China Sea, after the Canadian Navy said Chinese fighter jets endangered a helicopter in two close intercepts above international waters.

The comments come after CNN revealed last week that a Chinese warplane fired flares in front of a Canadian military helicopter on October 29, an operation that Canadian military officers said was reckless and could have resulted in the downing of the aircraft.

The incident was the second of two “unsafe” encounters the Canadian chopper had on that day with Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy J-11 fighters, which got as close as 100 feet (30 meters) from the helicopter, Maj. Rob Millen, air officer aboard the Royal Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Ottawa, told CNN in an interview on the warship.

    • @AnUnusualRelic
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Major Cracks Spotted On Chinese Aircraft Carrier Fujian

      I’ll have you know that Major Cracks is a highly decorated member of the PLA!

      (PLN maybe?)

    • @Sunrosa
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Does anyone understand the impacts of this (genuine question)? I doubt the crack actually goes very deep, and is probably just in the deck armor. But that’s probably very expensive to replace. I assume the point here is that it’s ridiculous their carriers are cracking on their own while in active service, probably due to negligence.

      Also, is it possible that’s just water or dirt? Or are we sure that’s a crack?

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        it’s ridiculous their carriers are cracking

        That’s the point, I have no idea of the full impacts, I am not a crack expert. Well, not in these kinds of cracks at least.

        Considering how bad modern Chinese construction can be, it wouldn’t be surprising if the whole thing just snapped in half.

    • @TokenBoomer
      link
      English
      -411 year ago

      It’s their playground. We’re on their playground. Imagine if China had bases in Cuba and Bermuda and were flying near our airspace. Geez, the liberal brain rot is real.

        • @Sunrosa
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          This is fucked up! Planes crash at lower altitudes from wake turbulence from much farther away, and that’s from being behind passenger jets! Not only do they crash, but they sometimes rip planes apart where they stand! This is an act not just of warning/bullying but of blatant aggression.

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          English
          -261 year ago

          It’s the best excuse. If China was flying off the coast of South Carolina you don’t think our military would do that? GTFOH

          • Piecemakers
            link
            English
            61 year ago

            Dammit, gramps. You’re standing in your own liquid shit again.

            • @TokenBoomer
              link
              English
              -21 year ago

              Attack the person instead of the argument. Nice.

          • @T00l_shed
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            In international waters? Sure maybe they would fly close to keep an eye, but they wouldn’t buzz helicopters or fly dangerously close to other air craft. Your brain rot is real.

            • @TokenBoomer
              link
              English
              -4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Sure. I give links with evidence. You insult me. And I have brain rot?

              • @T00l_shed
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                Yes you did provide evidence of China being a dick and potentially causing international issues. I don’t think that’s the point you were going for though hahahaha.

                • @TokenBoomer
                  link
                  English
                  -31 year ago

                  Beijing responds by condemning Washington’s ‘frequent’ military reconnaissance activities as ‘root cause’ of maritime security issues

                  From their perspective, America’s the dick. Surely that can’t be true. Hahahaha

                  • @T00l_shed
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    In international waters? In international air space? Around their ally Taiwan? China can get fucked they are going to cause an incident. Not saying the US isn’t a dick because duh, they are, but China is at fault here, hahahahaha.

              • @Sunrosa
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                This is paywalled lol.

          • @Sunrosa
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            The south china sea is bordered by many nations. It does not belong to china.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        It’s not “their playground”. Besides the fact that the South China Sea is a crucial international trade route (and thus shouldn’t “belong” to anyone), it is also bordered by many nations other than China, like Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines. And these nations are very bothered by the way China is using its size to bully them out of their own coastline. That is why Canada is there, to prevent China from dominating the smaller states. Obviously NATO has more than one goal in the region, but they are not uninvited guests and, in a world as globalized as ours, the South China Sea might as well be Canada’s playground.

        • @Sunrosa
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          The united states navy is also working in the south china sea for the same reason iirc

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          Might makes right? That’s a very liberal interpretation.

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          I’m not a tankie, I could just be an old man with a warped world view.