@cheese_greater to [email protected] • 11 months agoHow far can Lemmy support nested comments? Let's find outmessage-square222arrow-up1181arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1170arrow-down1message-squareHow far can Lemmy support nested comments? Let's find out@cheese_greater to [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square222file-text
minus-square@cheese_greaterOPlink4•11 months agoDid I actually do something bad? Like are y’all upset at me?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•edit-211 months agoYou’re a grey hat. Technical problems like these are likely to never get fixed until their consequences are demonstrated.
minus-square@cheese_greaterOPlink1•11 months agoI feel like I’m def more of an IdeasGuy, like I don’t implement stuff but I guess I’m good at finding edge cases/outliers.
minus-squareBlueÆtherlinkfedilink3•11 months agolooks like 128 deep from here, and that number feels very familiar some how. I just cant place where Ive seen it before…
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)linkfedilink5•11 months agoHmm… I got 99. The red line is there 14 times with full color change + 1 extra line. Each time it’s 7 colors, so 99. I double-checked.
minus-squareBlueÆtherlinkfedilink11•11 months agoIf in doubt look at the code: const MAX_COMMENT_DEPTH_LIMIT: usize = 100; I Guess that is the answer
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)linkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoNow, what would happen with other instances if you compiled it with higher number for your own 🤔
minus-square@FeathercrownlinkEnglish4•11 months ago128 = 2^7; powers of 2 show up a lot in computing. Looks like it’s 100 though per the below comment.
is it broken now?
So what’s the finding?
It looks like you broke the interwebs my mate
Did I actually do something bad? Like are y’all upset at me?
You’re a grey hat. Technical problems like these are likely to never get fixed until their consequences are demonstrated.
I feel like I’m def more of an IdeasGuy, like I don’t implement stuff but I guess I’m good at finding edge cases/outliers.
Yes but like quantified…
looks like 128 deep from here, and that number feels very familiar some how. I just cant place where Ive seen it before…
Hmm… I got 99. The red line is there 14 times with full color change + 1 extra line. Each time it’s 7 colors, so 99. I double-checked.
If in doubt look at the code:
const MAX_COMMENT_DEPTH_LIMIT: usize = 100;I Guess that is the answer
Now, what would happen with other instances if you compiled it with higher number for your own 🤔
I think you are correct, I based it on:
Maybe there are branches in the tree of comments?
128 = 2^7; powers of 2 show up a lot in computing. Looks like it’s 100 though per the below comment.
deleted by creator