To be clear: I prefer to pay for things instead of having to see ads but 13€ / month!? For a meta product that has inherently user-hostile design patterns even without ads?

Who does this appeal to?

  • @jacktherippah
    link
    English
    1751 year ago

    Just stop using Instagram. I quit mainstream social media (Facebook, Instagram, Reddit,…) and the experience has been quite cathartic.

    • LanternEverywhere
      link
      fedilink
      491 year ago

      I’ve been off of all social media for about a decade, but just yesterday i got a dm from someone from my past so i went and checked it out and then I checked a bunch of other stuff there too and my mental state instantly spiraled into a terrible place. Man that shit is toxic like nuclear waste.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          331 year ago

          It’s not talking to people that’s damaging. Being able to socialize and discuss via media is healthy.

          The damaging component is when an algorithm pushes unhealthy content because it drives engagement.

          No one set out to create a rage/depression/anxiety algorithm, but those emotions tend to drive engagement better than more positive experiences. So if engagement is the goal, you get destructive systems.

          Removing the algorithm does a lot for helping people engage with their peers and society at large in a more constructive context.

        • LanternEverywhere
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          No it’s not. Social media is where you know who the other person is and/or they know who you are. This is an anonymous forum, not social media.

          • Instigate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Social media are interactive technologies that facilitate the creation and sharing of content, ideas, interests, and other forms of expression through virtual communities and networks. While challenges to the definition of social media arise due to the variety of stand-alone and built-in social media services currently available, there are some common features:

            • Social media are interactive Web 2.0 Internet-based applications.
            • User-generated content—such as text posts or comments, digital photos or videos, and data generated through all online interactions—is the lifeblood of social media.
            • Users create service-specific profiles for the website or app that are designed and maintained by the social media organization.
            • Social media helps the development of online social networks by connecting a user’s profile with those of other individuals or groups.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media

            Lemmy fits those criteria very well, and there’s nothing regarding anonymous profiles vs identified profiles. It may not be the only definition of social media, but it’s comprehensive and sensible.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              Then email is also social media, Google docs is social media, phpBB is social media, Amazon review sections are social media, even Pornhub comment sections are social media, and so on…

              If Lemmy fits the criteria, then so does 95% of the internet. Not a very useful definition, in that case.

              • Instigate
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Yeah, I guess under that definition any web-based application that allows for a person to create an account/profile and generate and post content is a form of social media. That makes sense when you consider that they’re media that allow for social interaction.

                What’s your definition of social media? Genuinely interested because I’m not sure that there even is a single definition that can be agreed upon.

                I think the whole public vs anonymous profiles thing doesn’t really stack up, as I can create profiles on Facebook, Instagram, X, TikTok etc and provide no identifying information about myself, much as I do on Lemmy. I can also choose to add a profile picture and info about myself to identify myself on Lemmy if I choose, much as people do on other social media.

                If your definition only includes those platforms that force you fully identify yourself in order to maintain a profile, that list will be pretty small and exclude a lot of sites that the vast majority would consider to be social media, including the ones I’ve named above.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You might be able to create profiles anonymously, but you can’t use those services anonymously. They only work if you have other people added as friends or whatever, unlike content aggregators like lemmy or reddit, where you can be as anonymous as you want and still interact with all features of the site.

                  I think that narrows it down enough. If you can use all features of the platform without personally knowing anyone on it, it’s not social media.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Most definitions of social media are some form of “sharing content for the purpose of socializing in a public manner”. I wouldn’t think having a real life identity linked to your account would be a requirement for a social network. Why wouldn’t reddit, lemmy, or even an old school forum be considered social media? You’re sharing and discussing content on a community platform. I dunno, just something I’ve been thinking about recently as I’m using lemmy more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I did too and, while the benefit are higher than the loss, I usually feel really left out from one kind of partecipation to society and it’s a bit sad.

    • @Psychodelic
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      How many followers did you have and how many friends of yours were using the app, if you don’t mind sharing?

      • @jacktherippah
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        I had about 150 friends on Facebook when I quit. I’m quite recluse say so I didn’t really interact with them much.