• @bluemellophone
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    To accentuate the argument, relying on science here is not a good idea because concepts like “viability” will very likely change with technological advancement. In 100 years, it could be perfectly possible for a fertilized egg to grow into a baby outside a mother’s womb. Eggs or sperm could be genetically modified to correct for disorders and syndromes. What would viability really mean in this scientific context?

    This argument tormented one of the SCOTUS justices on the original Roe vs. Wade decision.

    • @Bernie_Sandals
      link
      11 year ago

      Could I have a source for the viability dilemma with Roe V. Wade?

      Would love to hear more about this

      • @bluemellophone
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        I highly recommend people read / listen to The Brethren by Woodward. It is a political narration of the inner workings of the Supreme Court by one of the same reporters who took down Nixon.

        • @Bernie_Sandals
          link
          11 year ago

          Just added to my reading list, thanks for the suggestion

    • GreenM
      link
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yet concept of “feeling” to make the decision is accepted. I see few problems with it. 1st mood change. 2nd everyone feels different. 3rd anthropomorphism . 4th feelings change much faster than scientific progress.