Feel free… I will happily point out the gaping flaws in your reasoning with any example you could care to provide.
Elon Musk had to discuss endlessly with the authorities
Of course he did - he knows the people in authority are his friends… so why wouldn’t he? It’s the people in authority that protects his exploitation… it’s literally the reason capitalists invented police. Why wouldn’t Elon work within the system that is designed to benefit him at the expense of poor people?
When people protested he had to wait until the protest was over
So you are saying that it was protestors - not police - that was putting up resistance to the rich’s exploitation?
You don’t say.
he know police and judge would arrest him.
No, they wouldn’t. Do you see police choke-holding millionaires and billionaires to death in the streets? Yes? No?
Another example
The exact same factors apply. This capitalist didn’t work within the very system that protects capitalist exploitation… and got a mild little slap on the wrist for it as opposed to a death sentence - which is a de facto risk for any poor person forced into an encounter with the police.
Who is going to stop rich or more powerful people if you abolish police and state?
Again… police and state exists to enable the rich’s exploitation - not prevent it. This means the assumption underpinning your question isn’t grounded in reality but in fiction.
Wow you are very naive. He had to discuss because he wasn’t allowed to just bulldoze a village and put his factory wherever he likes. You gracefully ignore that part.
Without laws and without police someone who is stronger than you and/or has more resources than you will just fuck you over. That’s exactly what you are criticising about the current system but you ingore that without laws and structures like police in place they would just fuck you over more. Because then nothing is stopping them.
You romanticise people by believing they would side by side storm Elon Musks factory, take his stuff and then be happily singing Kumba Yo.
What would actually happen is that he would pay people or promise them stuff to build his factory on the village, give his community weapons and shoot everyone down who comes near his property.
So maybe you have weapons as well and you win this fight. Now you are the group with all the weapons. What’s next? Maybe you want to distribute them around the other villages as well. What if not everyone in your group agrees? What if someone in your group thinks: “Great, now I can finally get that nice house I always wanted that my neighbour is living in.”
He had to discuss because he wasn’t allowed to just bulldoze a village
Yes, he could - it is simply cheaper and easier for him to work within a legal framework that is already designed to benefit him at the expense of the people he wishes to exploit. To use your parlance - you gracefully ignore that part.
WithoutWith laws and withoutwith police someone who is stronger than you and/or has more resources than you will just fuck you over as this is literally the current system we exist under right now.
Fixed that for you.
people by believing they would side by side storm Elon Musks factory, take his stuff
Yes. We would. That is why capitalists invented police.
give his community weapons and shoot everyone down who comes near his property.
You mean… literally the history of how the institution of police was invented?
“Great, now I can finally get that nice house I always wanted that my neighbour is living in.”
There won’t be any police around to help him do exactly that, would there? He’ll have to deal with the community first… who now has all the guns - as you envisioned.
Feel free… I will happily point out the gaping flaws in your reasoning with any example you could care to provide.
Of course he did - he knows the people in authority are his friends… so why wouldn’t he? It’s the people in authority that protects his exploitation… it’s literally the reason capitalists invented police. Why wouldn’t Elon work within the system that is designed to benefit him at the expense of poor people?
So you are saying that it was protestors - not police - that was putting up resistance to the rich’s exploitation?
You don’t say.
No, they wouldn’t. Do you see police choke-holding millionaires and billionaires to death in the streets? Yes? No?
The exact same factors apply. This capitalist didn’t work within the very system that protects capitalist exploitation… and got a mild little slap on the wrist for it as opposed to a death sentence - which is a de facto risk for any poor person forced into an encounter with the police.
Again… police and state exists to enable the rich’s exploitation - not prevent it. This means the assumption underpinning your question isn’t grounded in reality but in fiction.
Wow you are very naive. He had to discuss because he wasn’t allowed to just bulldoze a village and put his factory wherever he likes. You gracefully ignore that part.
Without laws and without police someone who is stronger than you and/or has more resources than you will just fuck you over. That’s exactly what you are criticising about the current system but you ingore that without laws and structures like police in place they would just fuck you over more. Because then nothing is stopping them.
You romanticise people by believing they would side by side storm Elon Musks factory, take his stuff and then be happily singing Kumba Yo.
What would actually happen is that he would pay people or promise them stuff to build his factory on the village, give his community weapons and shoot everyone down who comes near his property.
So maybe you have weapons as well and you win this fight. Now you are the group with all the weapons. What’s next? Maybe you want to distribute them around the other villages as well. What if not everyone in your group agrees? What if someone in your group thinks: “Great, now I can finally get that nice house I always wanted that my neighbour is living in.”
Yes, he could - it is simply cheaper and easier for him to work within a legal framework that is already designed to benefit him at the expense of the people he wishes to exploit. To use your parlance - you gracefully ignore that part.
Fixed that for you.
Yes. We would. That is why capitalists invented police.
You mean… literally the history of how the institution of police was invented?
There won’t be any police around to help him do exactly that, would there? He’ll have to deal with the community first… who now has all the guns - as you envisioned.
Do you live in a country without police, btw? How about you move to one without and see how well it works out for you.
So far, you’ve offered nothing to justify the existence of police except canned liberalsm and worn-out media tropes based on pure copaganda.
Do you have anything else you wanna try running past me or will that be it?