If you live in the USA, this has Terri Schiavo-energy all around. It’s different, I know. Terri was alive and braindead. This infant is gonna die. The court is sparing the infant pain.

But why would you keep a child alive to suffer? It’s like Terri in that the parents refuse to think about anyone other than themselves. That’s just cruel / terrible / bad.

  • @jeffw
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    This has happened a couple times in the UK. It’s a lot different than the USA for a few reasons, one being the NHS isn’t gonna waste money on someone who has like a .0001% chance of recovery (and why should they?).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      These decisions aren’t about the cost of care, they’re about the interests of the individual and, in this case, not prolonging suffering unnecessarily.

    • @zepheriths
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      This issue is coming up that it won’t be NHS resources being used because the baby will be in Italy using a Technically Private hospital, in Italy. There isn’t a good reason to deny that, especially when the baby has Italian citizenship.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is very good reason to deny it when it will only prolong suffering. That a fascist government has hopped on a Christo-fascist bandwagon is irrelevant. Her condition is incurable and she is suffering.

        Non-Fox report here: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/12/indi-gregory-critically-ill-baby-girl-removed-from-life-support

        Last Monday, Indi was granted emergency Italian citizenship less than an hour before medical staff were due to withdraw life support treatment.

        and here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-67378132

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          There is no reason to assume the child must be suffering. People with access to palliative care usually are not suffering, even if they have a terminal illness.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not assuming anything. That is the basis of the medics’ decision and the court’s ruling.

            • @FlowVoid
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If her doctors are unable to manage pain then her parents should be allowed to find doctors who can.

              She isn’t the first child with this disease, after all. And withdrawal of support is certainly not standard of care for patients like her.

        • @zepheriths
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          So the baby should die in part… Because of politics? The rest of what you have is fair but really?

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People with ALS also have a terminal condition that requires life support. Maybe the NHS will start removing their ventilators too, to spare them further suffering.