• @Maggoty
      link
      -31 year ago

      Yes, however keeping humanity in mind does not mean you never fire your weapon.

      • @NocturnalMorning
        link
        61 year ago

        Shooting at someone for trying to break into an unoccupied car is an extreme response. Pointing a weapon at them should have been more than enough

        • @Maggoty
          link
          -41 year ago

          There are real threats at that level though. Disabling the SUV could easily be the prelude to an attack because it’s the primary mode of escape. If that’s not it then you’re also responsible for protecting the automatic rifles and classified information in the vehicle. The vehicle itself is also highly classified to prevent people from knowing how to breach it’s armor.

          Presumably they went through the use of force continuum and got to warning shot because the guy ain’t dead and the Secret Service protection agents train at an elite level.

          • @NocturnalMorning
            link
            21 year ago

            Common sense says you don’t need to shoot at people trying to break into a car.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What about protecting the President’s family says “common” to you?

          • Buelldozer
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If that’s not it then you’re also responsible for protecting the automatic rifles and classified information in the vehicle. The

            No vehicle stuffed with automatic weapons and classified information should be parked in a public area and left unattended. You’d have to be dumber than a fucking rock to do it because leaving full auto weapons and / or classified information unsecured are criminal violations under Federal Law!

            • @Maggoty
              link
              11 year ago

              Well it seems like it wasn’t left unattended at all.