@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 1 year ago$266 Trillion in Climate Spending Is a No-Brainer | Without the investment, the alternative is $2.3 quadrillion in accumulated damage by the end of the century.www.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1160arrow-down11
arrow-up1159arrow-down1external-link$266 Trillion in Climate Spending Is a No-Brainer | Without the investment, the alternative is $2.3 quadrillion in accumulated damage by the end of the century.www.bloomberg.com@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareAnonTwolinkfedilink9•1 year agoThere’s nothing silly about it. The people who matter in this argument only turn their heads to money.
minus-squarefederalreverse-oldlinkfedilink4•edit-21 year agoBecause they are silly people. So yes, the tunnel view of the moneyed is completely silly.
There’s nothing silly about it. The people who matter in this argument only turn their heads to money.
Because they are silly people. So yes, the tunnel view of the moneyed is completely silly.