@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoFor real this time, NSF, I swear it's the last time.mander.xyzimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down124
arrow-up1208arrow-down1imageFor real this time, NSF, I swear it's the last time.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoMythbusters used a lot of mirrors, and could not get it to work.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-21 year agoThe concept is viable. Just needs moar mirrors
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoSadly I believe they found adding more mirrors did not appreciably raise the temperature of the focal point. Diminishing returns and all. So unfortunately more mirrors is not the answer, more Lasers is!
Mythbusters used a lot of mirrors, and could not get it to work.
The concept is viable. Just needs moar mirrors
Sadly I believe they found adding more mirrors did not appreciably raise the temperature of the focal point. Diminishing returns and all. So unfortunately more mirrors is not the answer, more Lasers is!