also feel free to comment your own suggestions for news sites for tech updates that don’t pay wall on the web page.

New York times - https://www.nytimes.com/section/technology abc - https://abcnews.go.com/technology

the hill - https://thehill.com/policy/technology/ BBC news - https://www.bbc.com/news/technology

while nonprofit Npr doesn’t pay wall, they have a new pop up that says something along the likes of “expected a paywall not our style please donate” that the user can dismiss and continue browsing the site. https://www.npr.org/sections/technology/

Reuters use to be a good source for me untill they started pay walling after a small amount of news article reads.

  • @ExcursionInversion
    link
    English
    -151 year ago

    Why do so many people on this site hate paying for anything? You’re not entitled to everything for free.

    • @ArghZombies
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Everything should be pirated, never use any Google or Microsoft service, use an email server you’ve built yourself, only get your social media access through obscure Mastodon servers, write your code in assembly language, only eat food you’ve caught or grown yourself, avoid the rental market by just building a hut in the woods.

    • @interceder270
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Because smart people don’t pay for things they can get for free if they’re already profitable.

      Useful idiots do, and they’re proud of it.

      • @ExcursionInversion
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So if all the “useful idiots” became enlightened like yourself. Who would pay for journalism, movies, games, server farms, food, etc to be produced and function?

        • @interceder270
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          if they’re already profitable.

          Products would still get made, there would just be less profit.

          So if all the “useful idiots” became enlightened like yourself.

          Don’t worry, they won’t. :)