@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoAAAAtomsmander.xyzimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1952arrow-down154
arrow-up1898arrow-down1imageAAAAtomsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year ago100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoEasier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
I think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
Easier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…