Maybe a naive question, but Is there a service like 23 and me but that doesn’t collect/keep my genetic information ? @[email protected]

  • @QuarterSwede
    link
    511 year ago

    It’s absolutely abusive that in order to get your genetic background you have to be willing for the government to have your DNA.

    • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat
      link
      131 year ago

      It’s not even gouvernement, it’s other companies. One day some insurance company will decide to pull out your protections because, turns out, you have X% chances to get a cancer by your 40. Then all other insurance companies do the same. Then, one of them accepts you, but you gotta pay N% more for the same coverage

      • @QuarterSwede
        link
        41 year ago

        That’s the fear. Government was just used as hyperbole to make a point.

    • Sparky678348
      link
      fedilink
      -23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What are the potential downsides of the government having your DNA? I don’t think I can think of any for real

      I mean other than getting in the fingerprint registry if you’re trying to commit a crime I guess

      • my_hat_stinks
        link
        fedilink
        291 year ago

        You’re absolutely right, I can’t think of a single point in history where there was mass persecution of any particular group by a government which might have been far more efficient of they had a handy database of every citizens DNA. Just never happens, not once in all of history. There’s definitely no shining example less than a century ago.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        What if the government in the nearby future decides it is illegal to watch porn? They trace your ip to your house, come with a search warrant, find you cumsock or vibrator covered in dna and you’re in the system. Boink! Off to horny jail with you!

      • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat
        link
        11 year ago

        Copy pasting my other comment

        One day some insurance company will decide to pull out your protections because, turns out, you have X% chances to get a cancer by your 40. Then all other insurance companies do the same. Then, one of them accepts you, but you gotta pay N% more for the same coverage

      • XbSuper
        link
        English
        -91 year ago

        Both of the responses to your comment are batshit lol.

        I don’t like the idea of the government having my dna, but does anyone have a genuine (non irrational) reason it would be bad?

        • @kaiomai
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          The cumsock comment was batty, yes, but the other is absolutely on point. You are delusional if you think this can’t go wrong.

        • my_hat_stinks
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          The US alone has a rich history of repression (Wikipedia even has a sub-subcategory specifically for ethnic cleansing) and it’s common knowledge those DNA databases have been used by US police to track people down so it’s really not difficult to link those two concepts. These are concrete examples of things the US government does or has done, not some hypothetical scenario.

          And that’s all assuming the data is only accessible to governments that have to pretend to care about their citizens, not the for-profit companies and malicious actors that currently do have access to that data.

        • @TheDoctorDonna
          link
          11 year ago

          Capitalism won’t let anything about you be yours if it can be avoided and the government works for the corporations. With enough money and government interference anything is possible and it is utterly naive to think otherwise.