• Dr. Dabbles
      link
      English
      -21 year ago

      Sure repeating his lies well for someone pretending not to like him. Maybe have a few moments of critical thoughts about the marketing BS you believe and who created it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Is it an elon lie that SpaceX has incredibly effective cheap reusability in their rockets? That seems pretty well established at this point.

        • Dr. Dabbles
          link
          English
          -31 year ago

          It isn’t well established, look how much NASA paid Russia for launch services, now look at SpaceX. Seriously. For pretending to be fans of this shit in general, it really is only the musk lies you people repeat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            5k/kg for Soyuz vs 2.5k/kg for SpaceX? I don’t get your point. Or are you talking about the ride swaps with Russian and US Cosmonauts and Astronauts respectively to ride in each other’s rockets to give dissimilar redundancy?

            • Dr. Dabbles
              link
              English
              -31 year ago

              Ah yes, the dollars per kilo fallacy. A favorite of people that don’t understand the industry but want to repeat the things Musk tells them to. Fantastic. We’re already on page two of the script. Now, go ahead and tell me how SpaceX invented something that already existed for decades.

                • Dr. Dabbles
                  link
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  You could start off with actual mission costs, launch support costs, and what missions need to be met. For example, this is why Star Shit is such a moronic idea when Falcon could perform all its launch needs.

                  Are you about to tell me that a 747 is always cheaper than a Cessna? Is that the next argument in your script, or do we have to skip a couple pages before you bring that one out?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    No, I was going to say that the launch support costs and mission needs are also more capable with falcon 9 than soyuz.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Starship is actually planned to be better on all those fronts than falcon 9. Cheaper per launch, less support costs, more capable and flexible system, etc. There might be some small use case where falcon 9 is still superior, but it will be pretty small if starship works.