• Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    that the 2-year-old boy took her Taurus 9mm firearm from her purse

    Right, so the safety was off then, because there’s no way that a two-year-old could release the safety on their own. The movies make it look like you just flick it with your finger but seriously that thing does not move without a reasonable around a force.

    • @theyoyomaster
      link
      91 year ago

      Many modern pistols don’t have safeties. Either way it shouldn’t have been loose in the purse and not in a holster.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Not a super knowledgeable gun guy, but I think a fairly common example is for the “safety” to be part of the trigger. Safety’s traditionally weren’t meant to prevent someone from shooting the gun, they were there to prevent the gun from going off if you dropped it.

        • @theyoyomaster
          link
          41 year ago

          Any gun made in the last 50 years shouldn’t go off if dropped. Physical safeties have always been about preventing human error. Trigger blades don’t do anything to prevent this. I get a lot of flack in the gun community for this opinion but Glock doing away with physical safeties made the entire gun world more dangerous.

    • @turmacar
      link
      31 year ago

      You can put a lot more force on any part of a gun if you’re not concerned about proper grip and aiming and just use your whole hand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Tbh not entirely, it could be possible, however unlikely. Honestly imo the bigger issue is off body carry in general is unsafe. Case in point your 2yo can grab it from the purse (and so can anyone else) but it’s harder to grab and easier to retain it from a real, good holster, either CCW or active retention (like cop holsters with the button) for open carry (I also generally advise against OC, but whatever.)