@[email protected] to World [email protected] • 1 year agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected]world[email protected]
arrow-up1391arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to World [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]world[email protected]
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.