When will be your “this is the last fucking time I’m voting for the ‘lesser of two evils’, then I don’t care after that, let this country burn to the ground”? For me, this is basically it. This is last election I’m going for that " lesser of two evils" bullshit. After that I’m done. It’s just pointless. Let’s hear it.

  • PupBiru
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    okay but a vote doesn’t actually benefit anyone, and neither does being able to say you “acted like a person”

    a vote is worthless on its own. a vote is only worthwhile when it has a chance of producing an outcome, and a vote for 3rd party has no chance of producing any outcome

    you get to take some moral high ground, which is great that you can do that and risk very little… meanwhile, people’s lives are actually at risk

    its a shit situation: nobody is denying that at all (well i’m sure some people are, but i sure ain’t!)… but realistically, the only way to make any difference is (as someone further up thread put it) to tug the tug of war rope on the direction you prefer, while working to change the game

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      That’s the thing. How do you define a chance of producing an outcome? You define it by people deciding to vote to make that difference. To go about it based on how others vote is to be a follower, and to make a difference is leading. I vote regardless of apparent voter outcome because I am devoted to contributing to said outcome. I’m trying to be the change I want in the world. The leading two people have always made it clear that choosing people based on what they have going for them is their game, a game I fight by doing exactly as I do. To be “realistic”, as you say, is to surrender.

      • PupBiru
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        okay, but now you’re fighting game theory and maths

        that’s just not going to work out well

        it’s irrelevant what you want at the end of the day… voting for some “best” option is only useful if it’s even remotely likely to happen… don’t get me wrong, if it’s a slim chance of a great outcome that’s one thing but the odds of everyone deciding to do the same thing at the same time are basically 0

        sure, vote how you like, but you’re more likely to win the lottery than to have a 3rd party candidate elected and i think we can all agree you don’t buy lottery tickets because you think you might win

        • Call me Lenny/Leni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I just don’t think voting for the least useful candidate who happens to be the one up on stage is by definition more useful. It’s similar to upvoting/downvoting a Reddit comment when almost everyone else is going the opposite way. You could argue resistance is futile, but you’ll probably do it anyways.

          • PupBiru
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            okay, well if the republicans had their way i’d be tortured forever in conversion therapy, there’d be no movement at all on green energy, the solution to homelessness would probably boil down to if you’re going through a rough patch it’s execution time, christianity would be mandatory

            both sides are NOT the same… 1 side is mostly inept, and the other side is actively trying to persecute people, to which i’d say

            First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
            Because I was not a socialist.

            Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
            Because I was not a trade unionist.

            Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
            Because I was not a Jew.

            Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.