• Firefox offers better privacy and security than Chrome, with upcoming support for 200 new add-ons. • While Chrome dominates, Firefox gains ground with user-friendly browsing experience and open-source model. • Mozilla’s focus on user privacy and transparency challenges Google’s ad-centric approach, making Firefox a viable alternative.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    The mobile experience of Firefox with ad block is so much better than Chrome. Using chrome on mobile makes the Internet feel broken to me. I can’t go back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -131 year ago

      Brave has the best mobile experience IMO. Built-in dark content (this is gamechanger, dark reader is broken on FF mobile, slow and breaks pages), background playback (though this has FF also), very fast, more than FF. Powerful rust-written adblocker (though UBO is better but is slow and broke some pages on mobile). The only thing that could improve more is extensions capacity.

          • @vimdiesel
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            you won’t get one “they heard it” . I prefer firefox because I’ve used it for almost 2 decades and know it inside-out, but brave is solid too. As long as it remains open source I’m fine with it , and it’s my “chrome backup” when a page is designed for chrome

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              you won’t get one “they heard it” The political bias here is real. Seeking the truth is more important than beliefs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I need more up to date reasons lol. We are in 2023, on those times brave hasn’t even the 0.0001% of market share…

      • @the_q
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @vimdiesel
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Most of us don’t care as long as the product is good. There are a lot more people involved with brave than him who are doing a great job. Unless you can actively show me a shit post history like Trump, I don’t gaf.

          • @the_q
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator

          • @the_q
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Yes, some guy having racist ideas somehow isnt as bad ad disrupting a lot of lives while taking a pay raise. There’s always a some degree of evil involved with anything at scale. pick the thing that screws you least.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Antisemitism? What? what are you talking about, we are talking about opposition to same sex marriage. You can think whatever you want, we live in a free society. Now, it is different if I approve or not that idea, but who cares???

      • @vimdiesel
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        ublock is not slow, the difference between it and rust is insignificant if you look at page load time data with a similar set of block lists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I am talking about Firefox ANDROID. Brave have native adblocker, it’s not for the fact that Rust is fast (that is), its because it’s native. the same way dark reader slows down dramatically some sites on ANDROID. Chromium have native dark mode for contents.