Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024::The “Manifest V3” rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.

  • @AustralianSimon
    link
    English
    -16 months ago

    Pretty much every internal Web application I’ve used in banking, insurance and Govt orgs.

    • enkers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Most of the time the site doesn’t really need chrome, it’s just that’s all they test it with, so they say it’s a requirement.

      There’s an addon for Firefox called User-Agent Switcher and Manager that allows you to have Firefox identify itself to websites as chrome (among others), and it often fixes the problem.

      • @AustralianSimon
        link
        English
        11
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I work in IT so I am aware of this. Maybe you’ve not worked in enough places that just build incompatible (cr)apps?

        And sure, just go outside our locked down machine policies and install Firefox and unapproved extensions. That will do down well.

        • enkers
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, “most” was probably a bit hyperbolic, especially for internal websites, and I guess it’s no surprise that the sectors you mentioned would be particularly bad for it.

          The best place for my little PSA probably wasn’t in response to your post in particular.

          • @AustralianSimon
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Sorry I’m snippy as I have personal stuff going on. You are right in so far as if you have full control of your machine which isn’t the case for the orgs I mentioned.

            We can pull FF into our dev environment so I’ve seen these annoying behaviours.

            • enkers
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              All good; I didn’t think about your comment thoroughly enough before replying, and you had a very valid point! ^^