• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    I’m no Muskcuck, but I am in favor of capping the generational transfer of wealth. Let these big inequalities die with this generation and set up a (more) even playing field for the next. If the rich want enhanced educational outcomes for their kids they have to fund public institutions.

      • @interceder270
        link
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He didn’t say Musk shouldn’t have to pay child support.

        He’s arguing that his children shouldn’t be billionaires out the gate because their daddy screwed over other parents.

        • @vxx
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They wouldn’t even become billionaires if he had to pay a million a month.

          • @andrewta
            link
            01 year ago

            Missing the point of the comment thread?

            If musk was a billionaire then died and settled in the money to his kids then how are they not billionaires?

    • @SCB
      link
      -71 year ago

      I’m so glad this insane take will die on the internet where it belongs.

      Imagine telling a grown adult they can’t give their kids things.

        • @SCB
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Nah I’m the normal person. I understand this is fringe social media, and I accept that, but you’re not the normal people.

          This is why downvotes and mean comments never bother me. I’m hanging out in the crazy neighborhood. It’s gonna happen

          But this place will eventually get more popular and every normal person that joins is just more of me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        give all the things you want. multiple BILLIONS of dollars? nah man.

        imagine telling a grown adult one person shouldn’t horder 30% of the money. IMAGINE!

        • @SCB
          link
          21 year ago

          imagine telling a grown adult one person shouldn’t horder 30% of the money. IMAGINE!

          Two things.

          1: You can just tax rich people without crazy-ass plans like this

          2: this isn’t how money works

        • @aidan
          link
          -41 year ago

          Yeah they’re definitely getting billions in cash??

          When they own a company where does it go when they die? Does the government just get it?

        • @SCB
          link
          -5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because it’s truly insane and will never get any support in real life.

          Absolutely no one will vote in favor of the government confiscating all of your property when you die. Tankie shit isn’t popular outside of a handful of message boards.

          • @confusedbytheBasics
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Capping the amount of wealth anyone can inherit seems sane to me. In fact it seems healthy for the whole economy, so not just sane but prudent. If you let all the wealth be collected by a few the system breaks down and all the money becomes worthless. Preventing that is entirely sane.

            I’m against preventing the transfer all all property. That seems like a recipe for corruption but I’d vote for limiting it to a trust of like $50-$100 million maximum plus an occupied home, a vacation home, and some reasonable amount of small property like boats and cars. Honestly that amount seems excessive to me but I think the majority would be in favor of such a law.

            • @SCB
              link
              11 year ago

              If you let all the wealth be collected by a few the system breaks down and all the money becomes worthless.

              This is not how wealth works

              • @confusedbytheBasics
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                An economy only works when a majority participates. An ideal economy has everyone participating.

                You can do a basic thought experiment to figure this out. Imagine 10 people control $100 trillion. Everyone else controls $0. What do you think you’ll be able to get for $1?

                You might then say, “money isn’t wealth.” True. But if 10 people control all the wealth and everyone else has starved to death that’s even worse.

                • @SCB
                  link
                  01 year ago

                  I’m sure you have lots of fanciful imaginings of how economies work

                  My kid believes in Santa.

                  • @confusedbytheBasics
                    link
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    #1 Are you not familiar with thought experiments?

                    #2 cool story bro.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Holy multi Strawman attack batman LOL.

            Because it’s truly insane and will never get any support in real life.

            It’s got lots of support IRL already. I support it, therefore your assertion of ‘never get support in real life’ is specious and incorrect.

            Absolutely no one

            bzzzt wrong again, I’d vote for estate tax reform in a heartbeat.

            no one will vote in favor of the government confiscating all of your property when you die.

            if this is what you think the estate tax is you’re incredibly stupid. yet another misrepresentation of reality to fit into your premise, but it’s so fucking dumb from the outset it doesn’t even warrant a reply. Yet here we are.

            Tankie shit isn’t popular outside of a handful of message boards.

            Taxing the ultra wealthy isn’t ‘tankie shit’ you fucking dirtbag. Cute attempt to associate ‘people who don’t think a few should horde all the wealth’ with ‘tankies’.

            Your entire argument is lies and garbage. Please, just stop whatever weird piece of performance art this utter shitshow is.

            • @SCB
              link
              11 year ago

              It’s got lots of support IRL already. I support it, therefore your assertion of ‘never get support in real life’ is specious and incorrect.

              Lol

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                that’s all you got huh?

                weaksauce. no refutation, no thesis just… lol.

                god what a waste of time your entire existence must be.

                • @SCB
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Bro do you even understand why what I quoted is funny?

            • @aidan
              link
              -41 year ago

              Estate tax is a tax, not a confiscation. If the tax were two high it would require manu inheritors to sell shares to shares to pay it, which would dump the share price of a company.

            • @aidan
              link
              11 year ago

              What do you think wealth is? It’s assets usually, very rarely cash.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                The key word here is “capping”. People are assuming for some reason that an estate tax means the repo man comes and takes all your earthly possessions after you die or something, but no one’s suggesting that. They’re suggesting putting a cap on how much you can pass down in an inheritance, as a way to prevent the hoarding of wealth by a single person/family.

            • @SCB
              link
              11 year ago

              Yes, clearly