• AnonTwo
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I…honestly don’t think you’re particularly honest about this.

    Mainly because Youtube red exists and it’s main sell is removing ads, but we already know the answer to that. (Most people don’t actually want to buy the service)

    And it’s not like it’s shitty service. It’s Youtube without ads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I don’t need music, I just want ad free YouTube. There isn’t an option for users like me.

      • @KnightontheSun
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        yt-dlp A bit of an inconvenience, but if it comes to having to sit through ads to see it on YT, I will download the video to prevent that. I already archive a couple of channels I love.

      • AnonTwo
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        …?

        Just use the ad free youtube…and don’t use the music section?

        That’s what I do 90% of the time…

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          121 year ago

          The price reflects including the music service whether you want it or not.

          • AnonTwo
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How much do you really think they would take off of the price tag if you didn’t have music? most similar subs are within the same price range…

            I always figured youtube music only existed to make the sub more incentivizing. It probably doesn’t even cost them anything they aren’t already spedning on youtube.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              It needs to be about half the price, if not less tbh. At its current price it’s rivaling netlflix, paramount, etc which are full studio’s producing the content, not just hosting it.