𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆 to [email protected]English • 1 year agoJapan is on its own wavelength.imagemessage-square244arrow-up11.11Karrow-down145
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageJapan is on its own wavelength.𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆 to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square244
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink99•1 year agoYYYY-MM-DD (honestly without dashes) is the only helpful format. If you name all your files with this as a suffix then your files automatically sort versions of themselves in order when sorting by name.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink31•1 year agoISO 8601 baby Though it ought to be a prefix, not a suffix
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•1 year agoTheir assumption is that the filename is the same otherwise e.g. myNotes20231122.txt
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoOh I see, thanks. Good alternative to final3_release2.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•1 year agoCame here to say this, I use DD.MM.YY in day-to-day stuff, but for files it’s either YYYY_MM_DD or YY_MM_DD, the automatic ordering is beautiful
minus-square@PilferJynxlink9•1 year agoYeah this method is superior for digital filing. I can’t imagine the sorting clusters I’d have to go through to find what I want any other way
YYYY-MM-DD (honestly without dashes) is the only helpful format.
If you name all your files with this as a suffix then your files automatically sort versions of themselves in order when sorting by name.
ISO 8601 baby
Though it ought to be a prefix, not a suffix
You mean as a prefix, right?
Their assumption is that the filename is the same otherwise e.g. myNotes20231122.txt
Oh I see, thanks. Good alternative to final3_release2.
Came here to say this, I use DD.MM.YY in day-to-day stuff, but for files it’s either YYYY_MM_DD or YY_MM_DD, the automatic ordering is beautiful
Yeah this method is superior for digital filing. I can’t imagine the sorting clusters I’d have to go through to find what I want any other way