• @ChonkyOwlbear
    link
    11 year ago

    That is a developed social hierarchy, not a natural one. An example of a natural social hierarchy is the belief that whites are naturally a superior race of that women are inherently subordinate to men.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      i don’t think you know anything about theories of hierarchy or even the natural world. what you’ve written here is incoherent.

      • @ChonkyOwlbear
        link
        11 year ago

        Let me simplify. You used the example of Democrats believing in haves and have nots. Observing that some people are more wealthy than others is reality, not belief in a hierarchy. Believing that rich people are rich because they are innately better and poor people are poor because they are innately worse is a belief in a natural social hierarchy.

          • @ChonkyOwlbear
            link
            11 year ago

            That’s not the same thing as believe by it is an inmate quality.

              • @ChonkyOwlbear
                link
                11 year ago

                That is certainly an argument you can make, but it does not qualify for the definition of fascism.

                  • @ChonkyOwlbear
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Close but not quite. Every human society has social stratification, even if it’s only things like the jocks and nerds in high school. That makes it fascistic is the belief that those strata are innate and not social constructs. That is, the poor are inferior while the rich are superior, or whites are superior while blacks are inferior.