• @reddig33
    link
    English
    41
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I will never understand why Valve sits on their popular IP like L4D and Half Life instead of creating new content.

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      621 year ago

      As much as everyone lauds valve, and its company structure, they do have problems with actually making things.

      There’s no real financial push to make things. They’ll make the same amount this year if they release a new game or not.

      So it’s down to if people at the company want to make something. And it seems they choose hardware more often and struggle to get things to the finish line without any real push to make that happen.

      Losing people like Chet Faliszek doesn’t help much. People who got projects finished.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 year ago

        Tbf an environment where people can work on the things they want seems a pretty good one.

        Like sure we aren’t getting more games but idk the steam deck has been a wonder creation of theirs, plus feels a bit entitled to expect more sequels or games bc we are just consumers of their creation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          231 year ago

          Not to mention the Steam Deck lit the fire under the asses of all the other manufacturers, if they weren’t already developing handhelds. Quite a positive price and technology chain reaction.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          161 year ago

          Right. This is as close to a AAA/AA indie studio as we’ll ever get. Studios who only make things they want to make on their own timeline not beholden to shareholders.

        • @echo64
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          It’s a unicorn that only works because they have a functional monopoly on PC game sales. Valve used to be exciting game developers, is all.

          • Rentlar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 year ago

            Their funding might have come from that, but in terms of design, the Steam Deck brings together the best parts of the Steam Controller and the Steam Machine, which individually weren’t smashing successes, so I see it as iterative.

            • @echo64
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              Great, if you like hardware. I enjoyed valve the game development company. I miss that, and I think that the success of steam and the loss of key personnel is the reason for it. That’s all I’ve been saying this whole time

              • Rentlar
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Totally fair stance to have. I was just responding to your point that the Steam Deck is “a unicorn that only works because they have a functional monopoly on PC game sales”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            Tbf they only have a monopoly bc they are the only ones who are providing a good service and there just isn’t much of a reason to use anything else. Nor are they hostile to competition

        • @PixxlMan
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think it’s good, although the situation does seem to be somewhat dysfunctional on the game front. They’ve made literally dozens of projects, some near completion, all abandoned for one reason or another. I think this video does a good job of demonstrating it. It summaries a digital book called “Half Life Alyx: The final hours” written by a valve employee. Here: https://youtu.be/mHdrosltGJA?si=9TodoaYu95HMtRqf

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because due to the “flat” corporate structure, it’s based on having enough people be “passionate” about it to even get it started.

      You might have half the staff “passionate” about Half Life 3, but when it comes to their individual ideas that make them passionate about it, they’re actually all on wildly different pages about what they want to do and what technology they want to pursue. This means you’ll technically have people on board, but because they’re driven by different passions, its harder to get everything and everyone to “line up” so work can be started on such a big project.

      It can leave gamers hungry for quality games, but I’m fine with all the work Valve is doing for Linux and Proton/Wine. I think those are important and worthy things to be spending time on, and I’m fine with not getting games from Valve in the meantime.

      Because really, I’ve got Larian for that.

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’ve got Larian for that

        A company that can count to 3. :P

    • @Kraivo
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      U mean a company that is famous for making tools and hiring devs with their ideas and helping them to make games does what they are actually good at?

      Look at it this way:

      CS is the mod to Half-life

      Portal is the college project or some sort of prototype (I don’t remember correctly)

      L4d is the mod to cs

      Dota is the mod to war3

      Dota underlords is same

      Their only new in house game in past ten years is actually Artifact and it got bullied by media instead of actually giving a good feedback.

      So, they just do what they always did - they support games they currently enjoying playing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Steam being a cash cow, a corporate structure that doesn’t force some/most people to work on stuff they don’t want to and internal politics that disincentivise people to go off on their own.