• @JackDark
    link
    English
    501 year ago

    The filing centred around the 30% cut that the platform holder takes, with the developer arguing that Valve used “dominance to take an extraordinarily high cut from nearly every sale that passes through its store” and that it has used its position to “exploit publishers and consumers.”

    Isn’t 30% standard in every store? Also, Valve certainly has dominance, but it’s hardly a monopoly. There are more options than any other OS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, surely they can point to the Epic v Apple lawsuit and also point to the ability to install Heroic or any other launcher/software on their platform, and the judge will laugh the plaintiffs out of the courtroom.

      I’m not a fan of the 30% cut, but that really is par for the course and any other company could compete with them on their own platform, unlike with Apple’s iOS. So I see no basis here for a lawsuit.

      I’m guessing the plaintiffs just wanted to meet Gabe and felt this was the easiest way to get a 1:1…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        A developer can even sell steam legs directly from their own site and not have to pay Valve the 30% cut. (If I remember correctly.)

          • DrWorm
            link
            English
            101 year ago

            I would like to purchase a single steam leg, please.

        • verysoft
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah as long as the game is available for the same price to consumers on Steam. Most people will just buy directly from Steam, so you would have to convince your audience to buy from your site directly.

    • verysoft
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yup, I don’t see how this suit ever goes anywhere. It would be a better use of time to argue that your $500 Xbox has a locked down marketplace and can’t play Steam/PlayStation games.

      • TwilightVulpine
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It shows that companies are regarded above customers when every console is a closed ecosystem with a single store, no sideloading support, but nobody challenges that.

        • verysoft
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yeah, all this about phones being able to sideload apps, when are they going after these consoles?

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      Yeah they don’t even force you to use steam on a steam deck

    • TwilightVulpine
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Apparently this isn’t standard anymore, and I can see how developers don’t like it, but an antitrust lawsuit over this just seems poorly justified. For whoever doesn’t want to sell on Steam under their conditions, there is Epic, GOG, Humble and ItchIO. Maybe those don’t sell as well, but that’s the choice the company is making.

      I don’t think being the largest store by itself is grounds for this sort of legal action. Especially not when they became the biggest store simply by providing good services for a good price, rather than any sort of restrictions at companies publishing in it.

      • @rdri
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Do you have some examples?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        What other digital distribution storefronts were around when Steam started? I honestly thought they were the first but maybe they were just the first successful one after using HL2 as leverage.