@CantaloupeLifestyle to politics English • 11 months agoCassidy Hutchinson Gives Dark Reason Why ‘Everybody Should Vote For Joe Biden’www.huffpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square185arrow-up1174arrow-down135
arrow-up1139arrow-down1external-linkCassidy Hutchinson Gives Dark Reason Why ‘Everybody Should Vote For Joe Biden’www.huffpost.com@CantaloupeLifestyle to politics English • 11 months agomessage-square185
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months agothat isn’t my standard. my standard is whether I want someone to win. that’s why I vote for people.
minus-squareFlying Squidlink1•10 months agoAgain- what does that achieve if they have no chance of winning?
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months agoI vote for the person that I want. that’s what it achieves it’s an end in itself.
minus-squareFlying Squidlink1•10 months agoNo, that’s circular reasoning. That doesn’t explain why you do it. Although it sounds like you’re saying your vote is symbolic. I’m not sure why you bother voting at all in that case. No one will know you voted.
minus-squareFlying Squidlink1•10 months agoCircular reasoning is a logical fallacy. Why are you bothering to vote at all beyond mental masturbation?
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months agowhen an action is an end in itself, saying so is not circular reasoning.
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months agoas you can see on the page that you just linked, it is not a formal fallacy. circular arguments are internally consistent.
minus-squareSybillink1•edit-210 months agoI have a right to vote. I don’t need to justify it to anyone. I vote for the person I want to win.
minus-squareFlying Squidlink1•10 months agoThat is irrelevant to my question. Please answer my question.
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months agoit’s the only answer you’re going to get. I’m allowed to vote for anybody I want. I’ve over people I want to win.
that isn’t my standard. my standard is whether I want someone to win. that’s why I vote for people.
Again- what does that achieve if they have no chance of winning?
I vote for the person that I want. that’s what it achieves it’s an end in itself.
No, that’s circular reasoning. That doesn’t explain why you do it. Although it sounds like you’re saying your vote is symbolic. I’m not sure why you bother voting at all in that case. No one will know you voted.
circular reasoning is internally consistent.
Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy.
Why are you bothering to vote at all beyond mental masturbation?
circular reasoning is not necessarily fallacious.
Yes it is.
Please answer the question.
don’t be petulant.
when an action is an end in itself, saying so is not circular reasoning.
as you can see on the page that you just linked, it is not a formal fallacy. circular arguments are internally consistent.
I have a right to vote. I don’t need to justify it to anyone. I vote for the person I want to win.
That is irrelevant to my question. Please answer my question.
it’s the only answer you’re going to get. I’m allowed to vote for anybody I want. I’ve over people I want to win.
don’t be petulant.