like I went to taco bell and they didn’t even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don’t get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

  • ChouxFleur
    link
    61 year ago

    How does the law require them to be greedy?

    I just assumed that it was shareholders.

    • @Touching_Grass
      link
      181 year ago

      Maybe not an exact law to be greedy but aren’t they legally responsible for acting in the interest of the shareholders not the consumer

    • @SPRUNT
      link
      91 year ago

      Not technically a “law”…

      “The shareholder wealth maximization doctrine requires public corporations to pursue a single purpose to the exclusion of all others: increase the wealth of shareholders by increasing the value of their shares. However, a company should be committed to enhance shareholder value and comply with all regulations and laws that govern shareholder’s rights.”

      The" however… " part is largely ignored, except for when it benefits shareholders.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        The “however” part you quoted explicitly mentions following the rights of shareholders. From what you described, there’s literally nothing else in the doctrine to ignore.

        • @SPRUNT
          link
          31 year ago

          Yeah, your right. I guess I got to the part where it said “comply with regulations and laws” and laughed through the rest.