• @grue
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    No, but looser zoning codes can. We need more multi-family housing and less single-family housing, both because sharing walls between units saves energy on heating and cooling and because walkable dense development saves energy on transportation.

    • @lewdian69
      link
      11 year ago

      Right? If since 1988, 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions, then housing codes are gonna do fuck all.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not what I was saying at all.

        What I was saying is that single-family house in a car-dependent neighborhood, even one that’s a net-zero passivehaus, is likely to cause more overall greenhouse gas emissions than an apartment in a walkable city center, even an old, uninsulated one, simply because the former forces the occupants to drive everywhere but the latter doesn’t.

        Sure, we need to regulate industrial emissions at the source instead of transferring blame to consumers, but housing and transportation emissions have nothing to do with that. Increasing energy efficiency of housing really would do a lot to lower emissions, but ending car-dependency of housing would do even more.

        • @lewdian69
          link
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “That’s not what I was saying at all.”

          Oh that’s too bad. Good that both things can be true.

          “Increasing energy efficiency of housing really would do a lot to lower emissions, but ending car-dependency of housing would do even more.”

          And yet still be a drop in the bucket.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            And yet still be a drop in the bucket.

            That’s not true. Housing and (car) transportation are a large fraction of total greenhouse gas emissions.