• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    What kind of perspective does one need to have to believe it is good when there are no resources (money, people) to care for the elderly?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      We’ll save money on out-of-control healthcare costs if the elderly just died instead of lingered. A tree needs to have the dead or dying branches pruned or they’ll endanger the trunk. The elderly are willing to sacrifice themselves for the economy; that’s what the Lt. Governor of Texas said during COVID.

      Not supporting this perspective, but I’ve heard social darwinists say “the weak should fear the strong” and other horrid shit unironically.

      • ANGRY_MAPLE
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These types people always talk as if they’re immune to sudden, life-changing events. It’s all fun and games until some random a-hole hits you while driving drunk and makes you permanently disabled. Maybe you’re unlucky and have your entire city/neighbourhood burn down from an uncontrolled wildfire.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I know this type of scary talk. It also comes up when people talk about assisted suicide. Some people on the fringe believe it would be a good option for addicts, the homeless, etc.

        They believe it’s a rational standpoint. In reality they ignore the consequence this approach would have for our society on a psychological level.

        • Ataraxia
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I shoukd always have the right to choosing a comfortable death though. Otherwise I’ll have to go walk into the woods and hope mother nature isn’t cruel that day.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I just wanted to reply “but those who aren’t rich would suffer” before I realised that’s not part of the perspective of rich people, probably…