The plaintiffs’ arguments in Moore v. United States have little basis in law — unless you think that a list of long-ago-discarded laissez-faire decisions from the early 20th century remain good law. And a decision favoring these plaintiffs could blow a huge hole in the federal budget. While no Warren-style wealth tax is on the books, the Moore plaintiffs do challenge an existing tax that is expected to raise $340 billion over the course of a decade.
But Republicans also hold six seats on the nation’s highest Court, so there is some risk that a majority of the justices will accept the plaintiffs’ dubious legal arguments. And if they do so, they could do considerable damage to the government’s ability to fund itself.
Either way, fuckin dumb. I will say I did Nazi it coming.
You think Lady Gaga is dumb?
I think you’re dumb. I haven’t interacted with lady Gaga and I doubt you represent her in any way. Stop being dumb if that’s at all possible.
I stopped being dumb ages ago, in preparation for our conversation, because I knew you’d care bby
Xoxoxo
Apparently not.
You’re not even trying anymore.
Try at what?
Not being an obstinate idiot. It’ll be hard but the first step would be to stop trolling.
Hey man let’s just hi five and be bros!
There’s that ableist bullshit again, is that all you got. Just insults and poorly researched overconfident nonsense?
Citation needed.