@DannyMac to Technology • 7 months agoGoogle caught placing big-brand ads on hardcore porn sites, report saysarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square77arrow-up1462arrow-down126
arrow-up1436arrow-down1external-linkGoogle caught placing big-brand ads on hardcore porn sites, report saysarstechnica.com@DannyMac to Technology • 7 months agomessage-square77
minus-squarekubicalinkfedilink58•7 months agoMany sites have to get rid of adult content because of complains. Now what they are also going to blame porn sites for having porn?
minus-squareDeceptichumlinkfedilink41•7 months agoLike people who move next door to a live music venue and complain about the noise.
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigodlinkfedilink15•7 months agoOr ones who move in next to a pig farm and complain about the smell
minus-squareSomething Burger 🍔linkfedilinkEnglish-19•7 months agoThey are right, though. Noise pollution is real and harmful. If the venue can’t soundproof its walls then it should close.
minus-square@ZaklinkEnglish20•7 months agoNoise pollution is harmful, but subject to an inverse-square law with regard to distance and not a big issue for people whose schedules are compatible with the venue’s hours. Seems to me who was there first should win that contest in most cases.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months agoThe only aspect which should be taken into consideration is noise ordinance laws, honestly. If the venue exceeds them, they’re clearly at fault.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•7 months agoFun fact: where i live if you want to build residential next to an existing live venue, soundproofing is your problem.
Many sites have to get rid of adult content because of complains. Now what they are also going to blame porn sites for having porn?
Like people who move next door to a live music venue and complain about the noise.
Or ones who move in next to a pig farm and complain about the smell
They are right, though. Noise pollution is real and harmful. If the venue can’t soundproof its walls then it should close.
Noise pollution is harmful, but subject to an inverse-square law with regard to distance and not a big issue for people whose schedules are compatible with the venue’s hours. Seems to me who was there first should win that contest in most cases.
The only aspect which should be taken into consideration is noise ordinance laws, honestly. If the venue exceeds them, they’re clearly at fault.
Fun fact: where i live if you want to build residential next to an existing live venue, soundproofing is your problem.