• Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    The whole basis of the cold war was MAD (mutually assured destruction).

    IE: If you are stupid enough to nuke us, we will wipe you off the map as well.

    So, this is no different to the US. UK, France, Russia, China, India and Pakistan having nukes.

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      21 year ago

      Ok but if Russia nukes DC, and the US doesn’t retaliate, Russia doesn’t have problems. If North Korea nukes Seoul and South Korea doesn’t retaliate North Korea suffers massively because they just nuked their border and a lot of their arable land. This is more like a threat of nuclear exchange between France and Germany but without Flanders being mined to hell and back

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok but if Russia nukes DC, and the US doesn’t retaliate

        What are you talking about? There is no way under god’s green earth that would ever be true. The USA’s whole nuke program is all about beingable to retaliate, even if the contenintal USA has been wiped off the map.

        That is the whole point of the nuclear triad.

        This is more like a threat of nuclear exchange between France and Germany but without Flanders being mined to hell and back

        When East Germany existed, France’s policy was to nuke Germany to stop a the USSR if they did invade.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          41 year ago

          I was referring to geography not geopolitics. No fucking shit america would end life on earth if someone launched a nuke near us. But Seoul doesn’t need be able to retaliate for North Korea to have very good incentive not to nuke it because it’s on their border

        • @shalafi
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Apparently OP has never heard of “boomers”. Russia could nuke every square inch of America flat and we’d still have subs splattered all over the oceans launching MIRVs.