downhomechunk to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agothis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1575arrow-down110
arrow-up1565arrow-down1imagethis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialdownhomechunk to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agowhat about the number whose square is -1
minus-square@affiliatelinkEnglish1•1 year agoas far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.) what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
deleted by creator