• @LemmysMum
        link
        910 months ago

        Global catastrophy will never be as emotionally convincing as individual suffering. Why empathise with more when you can sympathise with less.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -4
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The fishing is sadder to me because it’s intentionally causing unnecessary harm. I can see why accidental harm might be sadder though, and it is very sad either way. Systemic injustice and global catastrophe both need to be addressed though obviously

          • @LemmysMum
            link
            4
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Consuming for survival is not unneccesary harm. All complex life takes life to continue living.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -510 months ago

              The vast majority of humans can thrive/be healthy on a vegan diet, therefore it’s not consuming for survival. That’s an excuse or ignorance (again, for the vast majority of humans, especially those who are reading this. There are always exceptions tho)