𝗧𝗼𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 *𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑝𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛 to [email protected] • 1 year agoI prefer speeds per Swedesslrpnk.netimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1677arrow-down143
arrow-up1634arrow-down1imageI prefer speeds per Swedesslrpnk.net𝗧𝗼𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 *𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑝𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛 to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-21 year agoWhat? A pickup uses 15-28 l/100km. A Silverado uses 15MPG, according to GM themselves. That’s like 16l/100km
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•edit-21 year agoYeah pickups and SUVs are gas guzzlers. i get about 5.5L/100km with my Honda Fit
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoYa I don’t know why I’m being down voted for saying what my cars get. Never said anything better didn’t exist, just asked which other cars get less. I fucking hate Lemmy. I asked a question and I’m downvoted. Fuck this place. There’s no way to have a god damn discussion here.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoPeople probably misread the intended question as denial of lower consumptions cars existing. The interwebs are fickle
minus-square@wiesonlink3•1 year ago I’d love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km Could be an inquiry, could be a statement of disbelief. Up to interpretation. I’d love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km lol The “lol” at the end makes it read like your accusing the other commenter of lying and that you think this is an impossible to reach fuel consumption. Additionally, many people don’t like huge pickup trucks and worshippers thereof. You might have slipped into that category in their understanding.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoA Polo 3-cylinder runs at around 5.5l/100km mixed city/interstate. 16l is atrocius
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoI’ve never seen a 3 cylinder vehicle in my life lol.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoYou propably did but never noticed. It’s a 1l 75hp engine, topping out at 175km/h or 108mph. Perfect for a commuter car https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-three_engine
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoRemember The Ford Fiesta, or was it the Firefly?? Iforget the name but that was a 3 cylinder.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoStill is. Focus, C-Max, B-Max, Fiesta, EcoSport, Mondeo, Transit and Puma are the models listed on Wikipedia available with a three cylinder
What? A pickup uses 15-28 l/100km.
A Silverado uses 15MPG, according to GM themselves. That’s like 16l/100km
Yeah pickups and SUVs are gas guzzlers. i get about 5.5L/100km with my Honda Fit
Ya I don’t know why I’m being down voted for saying what my cars get. Never said anything better didn’t exist, just asked which other cars get less.
I fucking hate Lemmy. I asked a question and I’m downvoted. Fuck this place. There’s no way to have a god damn discussion here.
People probably misread the intended question as denial of lower consumptions cars existing. The interwebs are fickle
Could be an inquiry, could be a statement of disbelief. Up to interpretation.
The “lol” at the end makes it read like your accusing the other commenter of lying and that you think this is an impossible to reach fuel consumption.
Additionally, many people don’t like huge pickup trucks and worshippers thereof. You might have slipped into that category in their understanding.
A Polo 3-cylinder runs at around 5.5l/100km mixed city/interstate. 16l is atrocius
I’ve never seen a 3 cylinder vehicle in my life lol.
You propably did but never noticed.
It’s a 1l 75hp engine, topping out at 175km/h or 108mph. Perfect for a commuter car
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-three_engine
Remember The Ford Fiesta, or was it the Firefly?? Iforget the name but that was a 3 cylinder.
Still is. Focus, C-Max, B-Max, Fiesta, EcoSport, Mondeo, Transit and Puma are the models listed on Wikipedia available with a three cylinder